Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Frank Sterle Jr's avatar

Trump has demanded Iran’s “unconditional surrender”. If Iran complies, will it soon also have to surrender access to its vast fossil fuel reserves to American and British corporate interests? Those corporations, and perhaps also Israel’s government, know there still is much to be accessed, or effectively appropriated, from the long-demonized nation of Iran.

The 1979 Iranian Revolution's expulsion of major Western nations was in large part due to British and American companies exploiting Iran's plentiful fossil fuel. The expulsion may have been a big-profit-losing lesson learned by the energy-corporation heads, one that they, via intense lobbyist influence over the relevant governments in Washington D.C. and London, would resist reoccurring anywhere.

The 2003-11 U.S./British invasion and prolonged occupation of Iraq may also have been partly motivated by such Western insatiable corporate greed. According to AI Overview, “some [U.S.] companies did secure lucrative contracts for oil services and exploration in Iraq following the war.” Also, “British oil companies, particularly BP, significantly benefited from the Iraq War by gaining access to and exploiting Iraq's vast oil reserves.”

There has been a predictable American-UK proclivity for sanctioning Iran, its officials and even their allies since the Revolution, resulting in, among other negative impacts, reduced oil production revenue by the long-demonized nation. It would be understandable if those corporate fossil-fuel interests would like Iran’s government to fall thus (re)enabling their access to Iran’s resources.

It may be that, if the relevant oil-company heads were/are in fact against Iran's post-Revolution government(s), then so were/are their related Western governments and, via general mainstream news-media support, national collective citizenry.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts